No blog posts match your filters.
.jpg?length=600&name=Brickwork-Blog-3-Featured-Image(1).jpg)
How GTM Strategy Consulting Accelerates Revenue
The Gap Between GTM Strategy and Reality Somewhere between building a go-to-market strategy and running one, alignment quietly breaks down. Roles shift. Markets change. New people join with different ideas. A service expands into a new segment and the coverage model doesn’t quite follow. By the time issues show up in the numbers, they’ve usually been slowing things down for a while. That’s the nature of GTM misalignment: it’s gradual and hard to see from the inside. What it looks like is a pipeline that moves slower than it should, a team working harder than the results justify, and leadership conversations that keep circling the same unresolved topics. How Does GTM Strategy Consulting Help? GTM strategy consulting diagnoses and redesigns how a company brings services and products to market. It spans your ideal customer profile (ICP), revenue model, organizational structure, talent fit, as well as alignment between marketing, sales, and customer success. Rather than optimizing individual functions in isolation, it addresses the connections between them. The result is a prioritized roadmap that tells leadership not just what to fix but where to focus first. The best GTM advisors don’t just hand you a report and leave. They stay involved to consult, advise, and execute the recommendations. Why Misalignment Is So Easy to Miss Organizations evolve faster than most structures do. A new service launch, an acquisition, or a leadership change can shift roles and responsibilities overnight. Teams adapt, but over time, the extra effort required to keep up starts to show. Common signs that GTM misalignment is costing you revenue include: The same issues keep resurfacing in leadership meetings Performance looks acceptable on paper, but the effort feels harder than it should Roles and responsibilities have shifted faster than people have adjusted Collaboration between marketing, sales, and customer success feels strained or inconsistent Pipeline and actual sales are beginning to shift downward These patterns are hard to see from inside the business. That’s where an experienced advisor adds value by identifying where alignment is slipping and what it’s actually costing you. Putting the Right People in the Right Roles One of the most overlooked areas in go-to-market performance is talent fit. Even high-performing people can struggle when their roles don’t match their strengths. When that misalignment compounds across a team, it shows up in slower pipelines, inconsistent deal movement, and harder-than-necessary execution. What an Advisory-Led Assessment Uncovers The assessment starts by evaluating how your people, structure, and strategy work together. Advisors meet with leaders and teams, review org charts, compensation plans, hiring profiles, and enablement content. Then they layer in behavioral assessments that reveal how people lead, communicate, and respond under pressure. These insights explain the why behind performance patterns that numbers alone can’t show. And because the focus goes beyond a general organizational audit, the recommendations go deep on people, process, and technology in the places that move revenue. The 5 Areas Where Realignment Drives Results 1. Role Fit By comparing individuals and teams against high-performer benchmarks, advisors identify natural strengths and responsibility gaps. That might mean promoting overlooked contributors, shifting skilled sellers back to field-facing roles, or reassigning managers to positions where their leadership style creates greater leverage. 2. Structure Recommendations often include territory updates, redefined responsibilities, or teams realigned around new customer segments. For businesses that have grown through acquisition, this step brings multiple groups under one consistent structure. 3. Incentives Compensation shapes behavior. Advisors analyze whether existing plans are driving the right outcomes or quietly encouraging the wrong ones. The goal is balance between effort and reward, so teams stay focused on the right priorities. 4. Enablement Advisors define what good looks like for each role through playbooks that cover onboarding, training, sales process, GTM motion, and ICPs and personas. Playbooks are built to reflect how your team actually sells, so they become assets people actually use. 5. Coaching and Skill Development Assessments frequently uncover skill gaps that focused development can close. The most effective coaching programs are designed around the specific topics, challenges, and selling situations your team faces, often forming the foundation of the playbook itself. From GTM Assessment to Roadmap: What the Process Looks Like The process produces an insights report with a prioritized value creation plan spanning talent, tactics, training, and technology. But that’s just the beginning. The right advisory partner stays involved, working alongside your team to implement, adjust, and ensure progress continues. That hands-on approach is what separates this work from the broader advisory category, where a polished deck gets delivered and the relationship ends. For teams navigating a gap in sales, revenue operations (RevOps), or marketing leadership during this process, consider fractional support. This bridges the gap by providing seasoned leaders who can both help shape the strategy and keep the function moving while a full-time hire is sourced. Having this depth and training under one roof means nothing falls through the cracks between workstreams. The GTM Levers That Move Pipeline Beyond talent and structure, experienced GTM advisors focus on the key areas that accelerate pipeline and improve conversion: ICP discipline: Tightening the definition of your ideal customer so marketing, sales, and customer service are aligned on who they’re targeting and why. Funnel architecture: Aligning stage definitions, handoff service-level agreements (SLAs), and qualification standards across the full revenue cycle. Coverage model design: Matching rep specialization and resource intensity to segment complexity and revenue potential. GTM assumption validation: Testing whether the inputs behind your revenue plan (win rates, ramp times, annual contract value (ACV), cycle length) still reflect operating reality. Talent acquisition: When new roles are needed, recruiting with an emphasis on fit, not just availability. What Acceleration Looks Like on the Other Side When advisory-led GTM work lands well, the results show up in both metrics and culture. Leaders gain visibility and confidence. Onboarding moves faster because playbooks reflect how your team actually operates. Coaching becomes meaningful because feedback is grounded in data. Employees feel re-energized. They understand their role in the growth plan, see how their work connects to outcomes, and have the tools to succeed. Alignment becomes an advantage when performance starts to compound. Is It Time to Bring in a GTM Advisor? The highest-return advisory engagements typically happen at one of three points: Before a growth investment: Validating GTM assumptions and talent fit before adding headcount or entering a new market. After a structural shift: When a new product line, acquisition, or leadership change has outpaced your operating model. At a performance plateau: When pipeline, win rates, or team productivity have stalled despite effort, signaling a structural issue. In every case, the advisor’s job is to bring clarity to complexity, align people and strategy, and build a path forward the team can execute.
.jpg?length=600&name=Brickwork-Blog-1-Featured-Image(1).jpg)
Sales and Marketing Alignment: The RevOps Playbook
What Is Sales and Marketing Alignment? Sales and marketing misalignment is one of the most expensive problems B2B organizations face. It’s also among the most preventable. When leads fall through the cracks and unqualified opportunities inflate your pipeline, the problem is almost always structural. Revenue operations (RevOps) is the solution. Alignment happens when both teams operate from the same playbook: a shared definition of your ideal customer, a common language for funnel stages, agreed-upon handoff criteria, and metrics that hold each function accountable to pipeline, not just activity. With true alignment, marketing doesn’t hand off leads and walk away. Sales doesn’t treat marketing as a vendor that produces pitch decks. Instead, sales and marketing co-own revenue outcomes through a shared operational system. Why Most Alignment Efforts Fail Most companies attempt alignment with weekly meetings, a shared Slack channel, or a joint QBR. These help, but they don’t solve the real problem: sales and marketing are measuring different things, using different definitions, and looking at different dashboards. The results are predictable: Marketing reports marketing-qualified leads (MQLs). Sales doesn’t trust them. Sales reports pipeline. Marketing can’t see how their campaigns contributed. Leadership sees two conflicting stories and no clear path forward. The maturity signal of a truly aligned go-to-market (GTM) organization is each team knowing exactly who they’re targeting, how they engage, and what success looks like. That bar is higher than most teams realize, and it’s not sustainable without a RevOps infrastructure. The RevOps Foundation: RAISE The five elements of Brickwork’s RAISE framework provide the structural backbone that make alignment possible and durable. Mastering these helps to ease friction while also empowering your teams with AI. Readiness comes first, because you can’t align around a plan you haven’t clearly defined. This means establishing a validated go-to-market model, a disciplined ideal customer profile (ICP), and a plan of record (POR) – the single source of truth that connects board targets to executional math. Without it, sales and marketing are optimizing for different versions of the goal. Alignment is the step to formally structure your sales and marketing coordination. Synchronize goals, share funnel definitions, align compensation, and establish a unified operating rhythm. That’s alignment, operationalized. Intelligence transforms data into decisions – pipeline coverage ratios, MQL-to-SQL conversion rates, marketing-sourced pipeline contribution, and forecast accuracy. When both teams see the same numbers from a single source of truth, the debate shifts from “whose data is right?” to “what do we do next?” Systems and Enablement close the loop by ensuring the customer relationship management (CRM), marketing automation, and customer success (CS) platforms are integrated and governed, and that reps and marketers have the playbooks and training to execute consistently. How to Build Aligned Funnel Definitions The lead-to-revenue handoff is where most misalignment lives. A well-functioning RevOps operation defines every stage explicitly: Lead → MQL → SQL → Opportunity → Closed → Renewal. Each handoff should have documented criteria, service-level agreement (SLA) timelines, and ownership measured and governed in the CRM, not enforced through goodwill. Mature organizations benchmark their MQL-to-SQL conversion at 15-25%. If yours is lower, the root cause is usually because marketing is generating leads outside the ICP or sales isn’t working leads within the agreed SLA. Either way, alignment infrastructure surfaces the problem and gives leadership a clear place to intervene. Align on ICP Before You Align on Anything Else Shared funnel definitions only work when both teams agree on who they’re targeting. ICP alignment means marketing campaigns are built around the same firmographic, technographic, and behavioral criteria that sales uses to qualify prospects. It also means segmentation and territory design reflect ICP priorities, not legacy geography or preference. At Brickwork, we benchmark ICP fit % at ≥ 80% for mature marketing organizations. That’s not a direct measure of whether your demand generation engine is finding the right prospects. The Metrics That Drive Accountability One of the most significant mindset shifts in modern RevOps is holding marketing accountable for pipeline and revenue, not just MQL volume. The following are core marketing key performance indicators (KPIs) for mature revenue organizations: Pipeline Contribution %: Marketing-sourced pipeline as a share of total pipeline (benchmark: 35-60%, depending on GTM model) MQL → SQL Conversion: Qualified leads accepted by sales (15–25%) Pipeline ROI: Pipeline created ÷ marketing spend (5–8×) ICP Fit %: Share of leads meeting ICP criteria (≥ 80%) Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) by Channel: Spend ÷ new customers, tracked for trend improvement When these metrics are visible to both sales and marketing leadership, and tied back to the POR, the path ahead starts to become clearer. Marketing can defend its investment with revenue data. Sales can see which channels are producing their best opportunities. Both can course-correct faster. Another key part of alignment is whether sales executes consistently against what marketing provides. Key maturity benchmarks for sales include: ≥ 3× pipeline coverage per segment A formal deal review cadence with clear inspection criteria Win/loss reporting that gets shared back to marketing Win/loss analysis is one of the most underused alignment tools in B2B organizations. By sharing root-cause analysis from lost deals with marketing, sales closes a feedback loop that improves ICP targeting, messaging, and campaign strategy, compounding alignment over time. The Operating Rhythm That Sustains Revenue Success Alignment requires processes and roles that keep both teams connected to shared data and shared goals throughout the quarter. That’s governance. We recommend the following core cadences as part of a RevOps governance model: Weekly forecast calls between the chief revenue officer (CRO) and sales ops to validate pipeline health and in-quarter deal confidence Biweekly deal reviews for deeper looks at strategic opportunities with cross-functional input Quarterly pipeline reviews to ensure CRM data integrity and remove stale deals before they distort forecasts Quarterly win/loss/slipped analysis for structured reviews that generate insights for marketing, product, and GTM strategy Monthly commission review board meetings to align sales, finance, and operations on accurate payouts and comp governance These processes and collaboration are the operational heartbeat of a high-functioning revenue organization. With marketing participating in win/loss reviews and sales participating in pipeline attribution discussions, alignment stops being aspirational and becomes structural. Where to Start for Stronger Sales and Marketing Alignment If your sales and marketing teams are operating with different definitions, different dashboards, or different goals, the path forward isn’t another meeting. You need a RevOps foundation built around shared infrastructure, shared data, and shared accountability. Begin with three questions: Do sales and marketing agree on the ICP by firmographic, technographic, and behavioral criteria? Are your funnel handoffs documented, measured, and governed in your CRM with defined SLAs at every stage? Can marketing prove its pipeline contribution with multi-touch attribution – and does sales trust those numbers? If you can’t answer yes to all three, you have a structural alignment gap that needs to be fixed. Brickwork helps revenue organizations build the foundation for predictable, scalable growth. Whether you’re establishing your first RevOps function or improving an existing one, our team brings the frameworks, tools, and implementation experience to close the gap between strategy and execution.
SEG Relaunches as Brickwork
Sales Empowerment Group, the go-to-market partner for the mid-market, completes acquisition integrations and rebrands as Brickwork. Chicago, IL - 3/23/26 - Sales Empowerment Group (SEG) has rebranded as Brickwork, unifying its businesses under a single identity and launching brick.work. Brickwork is the AI-powered go-to-market partner for the mid-market, formed to design, build, and operate your complete revenue system.
Drive Higher Win Rates Through AI-Powered Roleplay
Every sales team wants higher win rates, but the real differentiator isn’t always a sharper deck or a new script – it’s how well reps practice before they perform. Just as athletes rely on repetition to build confidence under pressure, great salespeople rely on roleplay to prepare for the unpredictable moments that decide deals.
Why Is Buying the Salesperson So Important?
In sales, there’s one word that we want to hear more than any other – yes. We want to hear our prospects say yes to the sale, the deal or price we’re trying to charge, and the solution that we’re trying to offer.
AI + Human Selling: How To Find the Right Balance
Artificial intelligence is changing how sales teams operate. It touches nearly every part of the sales process, from analyzing leads and refining forecasts to enhancing coaching and improving call reviews. Yet with all that speed and precision, one question continues to surface – how do you integrate technology without losing the human connection that makes selling work?
Why Is Timing Such a Critical Factor in Sales?
When we think about why deals break down or fail to move forward, timing is almost always a factor. Even when the customer seems sold on the salesperson, the company, and the solution, if they’re not convinced that now is the right time to act, everything else can fall apart.
Are You Putting the Right People in the Right Roles?
Growth can slow for many reasons, but one of the most common is also the easiest to overlook – misalignment. Even high-performing people can struggle when their roles don’t match their strengths. Over time, those gaps affect how teams communicate, collaborate, and deliver results.
Do You Need a BDR or an SDR for Your B2B Sales?
Sales teams perform best when responsibilities are clear and every rep knows where they make an impact. Without that shared understanding, reps lose focus, accountability breaks down, and results become harder to measure. Our recent blog explored the difference between business development representatives (BDRs) and sales development representatives (SDRs) within the buyer journey. This article goes further, showing what each role owns day to day and how those distinctions help you build the right team.